I’d put the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt first for buyers who want a familiar deadbolt with built-in Wi-Fi, while the Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 stands out for Apple Home Key and fingerprint entry. For a simpler keypad setup, the TEEHO TE001 keeps the focus on keyless access without the broader feature set of connected models. The main choice is between convenient remote access and biometric features on one hand, and simpler hardware with fewer connectivity demands on the other. Door fit, smart-home compatibility, backup entry, and installation needs can change which option makes sense. Read on for the full comparison and recommendations by buyer type.
Get home appliances delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Schlage Encode is the clearest all-around choice in this group for buyers who want a conventional deadbolt and built-in Wi-Fi rather than a separate hub.
- Aqara UWB U400 brings Apple Home Key and fingerprint access together, making it a stronger match for Apple households than keypad-first picks.
- TEEHO TE001 favors straightforward keypad entry over remote control, a useful distinction for buyers who want fewer connected features.
- myQ Secure View combines a lock with a video doorbell, but that broader feature set makes it a more specialized choice than a standalone deadbolt.
- The two Veise VE017 listings share a model name and fingerprint focus; their finish differs, so shoppers should compare the exact listing and included hardware.
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 – Apple Home Key, Fingerprint Deadbolt (Black) |  | Best for Hands-Free Apple Home Entry | Model: U400 (DL-D06E) | Connectivity: UWB, Matter over Thread | Unlock methods: Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice assistant, app remote, NFC card (sold separately), physical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black |  | Best for Simple Keypad Access | Model: TE001 | Material: Aluminum alloy | User codes: Up to 20, plus one-time guest code | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock, Matter Over Thread, App Remote Access |  | Best for Long Battery Life and Shared Access | Fingerprint capacity: 50 | Passcode capacity: 50 | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Local Fingerprint Privacy | Material: All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant | Battery: 4 AA batteries (not included) | Battery life: At least 12 months | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ST380 WiFi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and App Control |  | Best for Built-In Wi-Fi Convenience | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice commands, mechanical keys | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Battery life: Up to 9 months | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control |  | Best for Fast Fingerprint Entry | Connectivity: 2.4GHz WiFi | Fingerprint speed: 0.3 seconds | Auto-lock: Configurable from 0 to 180 seconds | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint for Front Door |  | Best for Flexible Access Options | Model: YR01 | Access methods: Fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, and Alexa voice unlock with WiFi gateway | Included keys: Two mechanical keys | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| myQ Secure View™ 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Video Doorbell Camera, Face Access, Fingerprint, PIN & App Control |  | Best for Integrated Entry Monitoring | Connectivity: WiFi | Camera resolution: 2K HDR | Night vision: Color | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible |  | Best for Rental Hosts | Connectivity: Bluetooth and WiFi | Lock type: Deadbolt | Material and finish: Zinc, satin nickel | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Straightforward Remote Control | Connectivity: WiFi | Power: Four included AA batteries | Battery life: Up to 6 months | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Deadbolt, Black Suede Keyed Smart Entry Door Lock with Wi-Fi and Keypad |  | Best for Door-Aware Auto-Locking | Model: YRD410-WF1-BSP | Brand: Yale Security | Recommended use: Entry door, front door | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for Fingerprint Entry | Access methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, voice (Alexa/Google), physical key | Battery life: Up to 8 months | Battery type: 8 AA batteries | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for Shared Access Codes | Brand: PHILIPS | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Access methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice (Alexa/Google Assistant) | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Handle |  | Best for Simple Keypad Entry | Material: Aluminum alloy | Color and finish: Matte black | Dimensions: 5.62 x 2.7 x 3 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Long Battery Life | Material: All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant | Finish: Satin nickel | Access methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, key fob, mechanical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart door lock | Connectivity | Battery life |
|---|---|---|
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 | UWB, Matter over Thread | Up to 6 months per charge |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | — | Up to 365 days |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart L | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread | Up to 18 months |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | Wi-Fi via Veise G1 Gateway (sold separately) | At least 12 months |
| ST380 WiFi Smart Deadbolt Lock | Wi-Fi | Up to 9 months |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | 2.4GHz WiFi | Up to 6 months |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Ke | — | — |
| myQ Secure View™ 3-in-1 Smart | WiFi | 4–6 months |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock wi | Bluetooth and WiFi | — |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | WiFi | Up to 6 months |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Deadbolt | Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only | — |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | Built-in Wi-Fi | Up to 8 months |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only | — |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock wi | — | — |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | Wi-Fi via G1 Gateway, sold separately | At least 12 months |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 – Apple Home Key, Fingerprint Deadbolt (Black)
The Aqara U400 is the most access-flexible choice here, with UWB hands-free unlocking alongside Apple Home Key, fingerprint, keypad, NFC card, voice control, app access, and a physical key. Compared with the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, it puts more emphasis on proximity-based Apple entry than on a long stated battery life. Its Matter over Thread support also suits homes that use more than one smart-home platform. The tradeoff is that the headline UWB feature depends on a Thread-enabled Apple hub and compatible newer devices, while NFC cards are sold separately. Charging takes planning because the rechargeable battery must be removed or the lock taken offline. This is a strong fit for Apple households that value hands-free arrival, but less compelling if you want broad access without ecosystem requirements.
Pros:- UWB supports hands-free unlocking based on presence and direction.
- Offers Apple Home Key, fingerprint, passcode, app, voice, NFC card, and physical key access.
- Matter over Thread supports multiple smart-home platforms.
- Rechargeable battery is rated for up to six months, and the housing is IP65-rated.
Cons:- UWB requires a Thread-enabled Apple hub and compatible devices.
- Full feature support is limited to newer iPhones and Apple Watches.
- Charging requires removing the battery or taking the lock offline.
Best for: Apple households with a Thread-enabled hub and compatible iPhone or Apple Watch users who want hands-free entry.
Not ideal for: Homes without compatible Apple devices or a Thread-enabled Apple hub, since UWB access depends on them.
- Model:U400 (DL-D06E)
- Connectivity:UWB, Matter over Thread
- Unlock methods:Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice assistant, app remote, NFC card (sold separately), physical key
- Battery:Rechargeable lithium
- Battery life:Up to 6 months per charge
- Ingress protection:IP65
- Certification:BHMA-certified
Our verdict“Choose the U400 if your Apple setup supports UWB and hands-free entry is worth planning around its charging needs.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black
The TEEHO TE001 keeps smart entry focused on keypad codes instead of app and ecosystem features. It supports up to 20 user codes plus a one-time guest code, making it practical for households, rentals, or routine visitors who need separate credentials. Automatic locking and anti-peep password entry add convenience without requiring the connected-home setup found with the Aqara U400. That simplicity comes with limits: there is no listed fingerprint or app control, and security is rated ANSI Grade 3. The four AA batteries are not included, and the lock is incompatible with 38 mm door holes. Buyers should check their door fit and reset the lock for door orientation before relying on it. Pick this when dependable code access matters more than remote management.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes and supports a one-time guest code.
- Automatic and one-touch auto-lock options.
- Anti-peep password entry and low-battery alert.
- IP54 weather resistance and up to 365 days of stated battery life.
Cons:- No app, fingerprint, or remote access is listed.
- Four AA batteries are not included.
- Incompatible with 38 mm door holes and requires an initial orientation reset.
Best for: Landlords and families who need multiple keypad codes and a temporary guest code without app-based access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint entry, remote control, or smart-home integration, or whose door has a 38 mm hole.
- Model:TE001
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- User codes:Up to 20, plus one-time guest code
- Battery:4 AA batteries (not included)
- Battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Security grade:ANSI Grade 3
- Locking:Automatic and one-touch auto-lock
Our verdict“Choose the TE001 for straightforward multi-user keypad access if you do not need app control or fingerprint unlocking.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock, Matter Over Thread, App Remote Access
The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE pairs fingerprint entry with room for 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes, making it better suited to a busy household than the simpler TEEHO TE001. Its stated 18-month battery life reduces routine battery changes, while auto-lock and real-time notifications help owners keep track of entry. Wi-Fi and Matter over Thread broaden its connected-home options, though remote access requires a compatible Matter over Thread hub and Wi-Fi is limited to 2.4 GHz. The IP65 rating supports outdoor use, but a door sensor is not included, so the lock does not provide that separate signal about whether the door itself is open. This is the more capable shared-access pick for homes comfortable checking hub and network compatibility first.
Pros:- Stores up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes.
- Stated battery life of up to 18 months.
- IP65 waterproof rating and automatic locking.
- Supports Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread, app control, and voice commands.
Cons:- Remote access requires a compatible Matter over Thread hub.
- Wi-Fi support is limited to 2.4 GHz.
- Door sensor is not included.
Best for: Larger households that want fingerprint and passcode access for many users, plus connected features and less frequent battery changes.
Not ideal for: Buyers who lack a compatible Matter over Thread hub for remote access or need a door sensor included.
- Fingerprint capacity:50
- Passcode capacity:50
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Weather resistance:IP65 waterproof
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Installation:DIY; stated 10 minutes
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical; 18-month electronic
Our verdict“Choose the Bolt SE when you need many fingerprint and code slots and can meet its hub requirements for remote access.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 is a fingerprint-focused option for buyers who want local encrypted credential storage and several ways to get in, including keypad, key fob, and mechanical key. Its AES128 local encryption and customizable permissions give it a privacy-oriented profile that the TEEHO TE001, which centers on keypad codes, does not share. Remote access and voice control depend on a separate Veise G1 Gateway, so the advertised app and assistant features can involve extra setup and hardware. The zinc-alloy body is scratch-resistant, but its IP55 rating is less suited to exposed locations than the IP65-rated ULTRALOQ Bolt SE. It makes the most sense for a sheltered entry where fingerprint access and local storage matter more than built-in remote connectivity.
Pros:- Fingerprint recognition with multiple alternate entry methods.
- AES128 local encryption and customizable access permissions.
- Scratch-resistant all-zinc alloy construction.
- DIY installation with no wiring required.
Cons:- Remote access and voice control require a separately sold G1 Gateway.
- Four AA batteries are not included.
- IP55 rating is not suited to heavy rain exposure.
Best for: Privacy-conscious households that want fingerprint entry and encrypted local storage at a sheltered door.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking built-in remote access or a lock for a doorway exposed to heavy rain.
- Material:All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant
- Battery:4 AA batteries (not included)
- Battery life:At least 12 months
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi via Veise G1 Gateway (sold separately)
- Security:AES128 local encryption, anti-peeping PIN, intrusion alarms
- Certification:BHMA/ANSI
- Installation:DIY; stated 15 minutes
- Weather resistance:IP55
- Voice control:Alexa and Google Assistant via G1 Gateway
Our verdict“Choose the VE017 for local encrypted fingerprint access at a sheltered door if you are willing to add its gateway for remote features.”
ST380 WiFi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and App Control
The ST380 combines fingerprint, PIN, app, voice-command, and mechanical-key entry with built-in Wi-Fi, so remote control does not depend on an additional gateway. That makes it more immediately connected than the Veise VE017, whose remote features require a separately sold G1 Gateway. App notifications and voice access can help households manage entry remotely, while the stated battery life of up to nine months is shorter than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE‘s 18 months. The product data also sets a specific fit range: doors must be 35–50 mm thick, with a 60 or 70 mm backset. Buyers should verify those measurements before choosing it. This is a practical connected pick for compatible doors, though the listing gives fewer security and weather-resistance details than some alternatives.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables app remote control without a separate hub.
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, app, voice-command, and mechanical-key access.
- Provides real-time notifications.
- DIY installation is stated to take under 15 minutes.
Cons:- Stated battery life is up to nine months and may be shorter with heavy use.
- Fits only doors 35–50 mm thick with a 60 or 70 mm backset.
- Setup or app use may feel complex to some buyers.
Best for: Households with a compatible door that want app-based remote control without buying a separate gateway.
Not ideal for: Owners of doors outside the 35–50 mm thickness range or buyers who prioritize a longer stated battery life.
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice commands, mechanical keys
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Battery life:Up to 9 months
- Door thickness:35–50 mm
- Backset compatibility:60 mm or 70 mm
- Material:Metal and plastic
- Weight:2.8 lb
Our verdict“Choose the ST380 if you want built-in Wi-Fi and your door matches its fit dimensions, while accepting more frequent battery changes than the Bolt SE.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control
The Philips 4200 Series suits households that want quick biometric entry alongside remote app control. Its 0.3-second fingerprint access can make coming home simpler than entering a PIN, while built-in 2.4GHz WiFi lets you manage the lock without a separate gateway. Compared with the Schlage Encode, which focuses on keypad access and a built-in alarm, this Philips adds fingerprint entry but does not list an alarm. The included handle and deadbolt hardware make it a fuller door update, though the lock is designed for right-opening doors by default, so left-opening doors may need adjustment. Auto-lock is configurable from 0 to 180 seconds, but must first be enabled in the app. Buyers should also plan to supply their own alkaline batteries.
Pros:- Fingerprint access is specified to recognize a print in 0.3 seconds
- Built-in 2.4GHz WiFi supports app control without a separate gateway
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, app, and voice assistant access options
- Includes a door lever and latch hardware
Cons:- Batteries must be purchased separately
- Auto-lock needs to be activated manually in the app
- Designed for right-opening doors by default
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry, app-based remote management, and a matching handle and deadbolt in one installation
Not ideal for: People with left-opening doors who want a straightforward fit, or buyers who expect batteries to be included
- Connectivity:2.4GHz WiFi
- Fingerprint speed:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock:Configurable from 0 to 180 seconds
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Battery type:Standard 1.5V alkaline batteries; not included
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38 to 50 mm)
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if quick fingerprint entry and built-in WiFi matter more to you than an included battery set or a built-in alarm.”
Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad and Fingerprint for Front Door
The Yamiry YR01 is aimed at households or rental managers who want several ways to get through the same door: fingerprint, passcode, app, key fob, or mechanical key. That flexibility gives it a broader backup plan than the Philips 4200 Series, whose supplied details emphasize fingerprint, PIN, and app access. The YR01 also has a reversible handle and adjustable latch, which can make it easier to fit a range of standard doors without extra drilling. Remote management comes through the app, but Alexa voice unlocking requires a separate WiFi gateway, so it is less direct for smart-home users than the Schlage Encode, which has built-in WiFi. Buyers who are not comfortable managing lock settings in an app may find its many access methods harder to set up.
Pros:- Provides fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, and mechanical key access
- Includes two key fobs and two mechanical keys
- Reversible handle and adjustable latch suit many standard doors
- App supports remote access management
Cons:- Alexa voice unlocking requires a separate WiFi gateway
- Managing multiple access methods may take more app setup
- Product details limit the stated use to front doors
Best for: Landlords and households that want fobs, keys, fingerprint, and passcodes available as alternatives for different users
Not ideal for: Buyers who want Alexa voice unlocking without an extra gateway or who prefer a simple keypad-only setup
- Model:YR01
- Access methods:Fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, and Alexa voice unlock with WiFi gateway
- Included keys:Two mechanical keys
- Included key fobs:Two
- Installation:Quick installation; adjustable latch; no additional drilling stated
- Recommended use:Indoors and exterior doors
Our verdict“Pick the Yamiry if several household members need different entry methods and you are comfortable with app setup and a separate gateway for Alexa.”
myQ Secure View™ 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Video Doorbell Camera, Face Access, Fingerprint, PIN & App Control
The myQ Secure View makes sense for buyers who want entry control and doorstep monitoring on one device. It combines a deadbolt, video doorbell, and camera with 2K HDR video, color night vision, two-way audio, and several unlocking methods. That gives it a wider security role than the Schlage Encode, which centers on remote lock control, a touchscreen, and a built-in alarm rather than a camera. The tradeoff is a larger, heavier unit and more features to keep powered: the listed battery life is 4–6 months, with heavy use potentially bringing more frequent recharging. AI-powered detection also requires a subscription, and face access is available only in the US and Canada. This is a better fit for an entryway upgrade than for someone seeking a simple smart deadbolt.
Pros:- Combines a smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera
- 2K HDR video and color night vision support doorstep monitoring
- Offers face, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key access
- Weather-resistant design and DIY installation are specified
Cons:- AI-powered smart detection requires a subscription
- Face access is listed as available only in the US and Canada
- Battery life is listed at 4–6 months and may shorten with heavy use
Best for: Homeowners who want one app-managed entry device for locking, video doorbell duties, and checking activity at the door
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a compact deadbolt, those outside the US and Canada who want face access, or people avoiding subscription-based detection
- Connectivity:WiFi
- Camera resolution:2K HDR
- Night vision:Color
- Access methods:Face, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key
- Battery life:4–6 months
- Dimensions:2.95 x 3.84 x 6.85 inches
- Weight:4.9 pounds
- Face access availability:US and Canada
Our verdict“Choose the myQ if video monitoring is as important as keyless entry and you accept the subscription and charging tradeoffs.”
Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible
The Sifely S combines fingerprint, keypad, fob, and keyed entry with app management, making it a practical match for hosts who need to give different guests different ways in. Its listed anti-peeping password and back-lit keypad also help make code entry more usable at a dark entryway. Compared with the Yamiry YR01, this model specifies Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity and lists auto-lock and one-touch locking. Remote unlocking by voice still depends on an optional WiFi gateway, so it is not as self-contained as the Schlage Encode with built-in WiFi. The tradeoff is less certainty about upkeep: battery life is not provided, and some buyers may find the setup process more involved than a basic keypad lock.
Pros:- Supports fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, and keyed entry
- Includes two keys and two key cards
- Auto-lock, one-touch locking, and anti-peeping password are listed
- Reversible handle and DIY installation fit many standard doors
Cons:- Remote voice unlocking requires an optional WiFi gateway
- Battery life is not specified
- Setup may be complex for buyers unfamiliar with app-managed locks
Best for: Airbnb hosts and rental managers who need multiple access types, app-based guest management, and a physical key backup
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a stated battery-life estimate or want voice unlocking without buying a WiFi gateway
- Connectivity:Bluetooth and WiFi
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Material and finish:Zinc, satin nickel
- Access features:Fingerprint, fob, passcode, touchscreen, and key
- Locking features:Auto-lock and one-touch lock
- Included keys and cards:Two keys and two key cards
- Door compatibility:Most standard doors; reversible handle
- Warranty:One year
Our verdict“The Sifely S suits rental hosts who value flexible guest access and can accommodate gateway-dependent voice control.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode is the clearest fit here for buyers who want remote access without adding a gateway: built-in WiFi connects the deadbolt to the Schlage Home app, and it works with Alexa, Google Home, Ring, and Airbnb. Its touchscreen and built-in alarm put the emphasis on controlled, keypad-based entry and security alerts. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series, it lacks the listed fingerprint option, but it includes four AA batteries and gives a mechanical warranty that Philips’ supplied details do not specify. The tradeoff is a narrower access approach than the Sifely S, which offers fingerprint and fob entry. Battery life is listed as up to six months and can vary with use; the touchscreen’s responsiveness may also be inconsistent.
Pros:- Built-in WiFi supports remote app control without a separate hub
- Compatible with Alexa, Google Home, Ring, and Airbnb
- Built-in alarm and encrypted connection are listed
- Includes four AA batteries and installation hardware
Cons:- Does not list fingerprint or fob access
- Battery life may shorten with heavy use
- Touchscreen responsiveness may vary
Best for: Homeowners who want app-based remote deadbolt control, broad smart-home compatibility, and an included battery set
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize fingerprint or fob entry, or who want connectivity options beyond WiFi
- Connectivity:WiFi
- Power:Four included AA batteries
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Security features:Built-in alarm, encrypted connection, fingerprint-resistant touchscreen
- Compatibility:Alexa, Google Home, Ring, and Airbnb
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Schlage Encode for direct WiFi remote control and broad integrations if keypad entry meets your needs.”
Yale Assure Lock 2 Deadbolt, Black Suede Keyed Smart Entry Door Lock with Wi-Fi and Keypad
The Yale Assure Lock 2 suits households that want a familiar deadbolt with several ways to get in: keypad, app, voice assistant, and auto-unlock. Its DoorSense feature can tell whether the door is closed, helping its auto-lock routine respond to the door’s actual position rather than relying only on a timer. That gives it a useful edge over the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, whose listed features do not include open-and-closed door detection. The included Wi-Fi module also supports remote access and notifications, while installation is designed for a DIY setup. The tradeoffs are its 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi requirement and stated US and Canada availability. Buyers seeking fingerprint entry may prefer the eufy C220; Yale’s case is strongest when door status and flexible access matter more.
Pros:- Keypad, voice assistant, auto-unlock, and smartphone app access
- DoorSense supports auto-locking based on door status
- Wi-Fi module enables remote access and notifications
- Designed for installation without a locksmith
Cons:- Works only with 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Listed for use in the US and Canada
- No fingerprint entry method is listed
Best for: Households that want app-based remote access and auto-locking tied to whether the entry door is closed
Not ideal for: Buyers whose home Wi-Fi uses only 5 GHz, or who need a lock specified for use outside the US and Canada
- Model:YRD410-WF1-BSP
- Brand:Yale Security
- Recommended use:Entry door, front door
- Access methods:Keypad, voice assistant, auto-unlock, smartphone app
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only
- Door status feature:DoorSense
- Included components:Wi-Fi Smart Module, deadbolt, latch plates, mounting hardware, DoorSense, install manual
- Warranty:Lifetime on finish and mechanical parts; 1 year on electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Yale Assure Lock 2 if door-aware auto-locking and several familiar entry methods matter more than fingerprint access.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock
The eufy C220 is the clearest fit here for people who want to open a deadbolt with a fingerprint and still keep keypad, app, voice, and physical-key options available. Its built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a separately listed gateway, unlike the Veise VE017, which requires its G1 Gateway for Wi-Fi features. The C220 also lists an eight-month battery life and replaceable AA batteries, giving buyers a stated maintenance interval to plan around. Its IP53 rating and BHMA Grade 3 certification add concrete durability and security details. Fingerprint recognition can vary with usage, and Wi-Fi setup may take some effort. Compared with Yale’s DoorSense-equipped deadbolt, eufy prioritizes biometric convenience over door-status detection.
Pros:- Fingerprint, keypad, app, voice, and physical-key access
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a separately listed gateway
- Specified battery life of up to eight months with replaceable AA batteries
- IP53 weather rating and BHMA Grade 3 certification
Cons:- Fingerprint recognition may vary with use
- Wi-Fi connectivity may require technical setup
- No door-status sensor is listed
Best for: People who want fingerprint access on a standard deadbolt with remote control and backup entry methods
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize door-open detection or want to avoid fingerprint setup and recognition variability
- Access methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, voice (Alexa/Google), physical key
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Battery type:8 AA batteries
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Compatibility:Most standard deadbolts; bore under 54 mm
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
Our verdict“Pick the eufy C220 if fingerprint entry and built-in remote access are your priorities in a standard deadbolt.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt makes a strong case for households that need to issue access to several people: it supports up to 100 custom passcodes, alongside fingerprint, app, physical-key, and voice entry. Remote access and real-time notifications can help an owner manage arrivals while away. Against the eufy C220, Philips lists a much larger passcode capacity, while eufy provides specified battery-life, weather-rating, and certification details that Philips’ supplied product data does not. Philips also lacks door-open detection, so it cannot match the Yale Assure Lock 2’s DoorSense feature for knowing whether the door is shut. Its 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi limit and AA batteries, which are not included, add setup and upkeep considerations. It fits access-code management better than sensor-led door monitoring.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes
- Offers app, fingerprint, passcode, physical-key, and voice access
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access and notifications
- Designed for DIY installation on most doors
Cons:- Requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- AA alkaline batteries are not included
- Does not support door open/close detection
Best for: Property owners or households that need many individual passcodes and remote access notifications
Not ideal for: Buyers who need open-and-closed door detection or want battery and weather specifications clearly stated
- Brand:PHILIPS
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Access methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice (Alexa/Google Assistant)
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 custom passcodes
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only
- Notifications:Real-time notifications
- Included components:1 door lock
- Power:AA alkaline batteries required; not included
Our verdict“Choose the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt if managing many passcodes remotely matters more than door-status sensing.”
Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Handle
This Yamiry keypad lock is the lineup’s straightforward choice for buyers who want code entry and auto-lock on a door knob rather than a connected deadbolt. It offers 20 user codes and two backup keys, so household members and occasional visitors can have separate entry options without relying on an app. The IP54 rating and aluminum-alloy construction give it a stated weather-resistance detail that is absent from the Philips Wi-Fi deadbolt’s supplied specs. That simpler setup also means fewer connected features: unlike the Yale Assure Lock 2, it has no listed remote access, app control, or DoorSense. Its fit is limited by door type and dimensions, and battery replacement is part of ownership. It makes sense when local keypad access matters more than smart-home management.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes
- Includes two backup keys
- Auto-lock is included
- Aluminum-alloy construction with an IP54 weather-resistance rating
Cons:- No app, Wi-Fi, or remote access is listed
- May not fit every door type
- Battery replacement is required, with no battery-life figure supplied
Best for: Households wanting multiple local entry codes, backup keys, and auto-lock on a compatible front-door knob
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote app access, fingerprint entry, or a deadbolt format
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Color and finish:Matte black
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.7 x 3 inches
- Weight:1.18 kg
- User codes:20
- Backup keys:2
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Weather resistance:IP54
Our verdict“Choose this Yamiry lock for code-based local entry on a compatible door knob when remote control is unnecessary.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Satin Nickel
The Veise VE017 combines fingerprint, keypad, key-fob, and mechanical-key entry with a stated battery life of at least 12 months on four AA batteries. That long interval gives it a useful distinction from the eufy C220, which lists up to eight months, and may suit a door that sees frequent use. Its activity logs, anti-peeping password, intrusion alarms, and AES128 encryption add access-management details for homes or multi-tenant settings. Remote Wi-Fi control and Alexa or Google Assistant support require a separately sold G1 Gateway, however; eufy includes built-in Wi-Fi. Buyers should also be comfortable with app setup to use its broader features. This is a better match for people who value battery interval and access logs than for those seeking ready-to-use remote control.
Pros:- Fingerprint, keypad, key-fob, and mechanical-key entry
- Specified battery life of at least 12 months
- Activity logs, intrusion alarms, anti-peeping password, and AES128 encryption
- Designed for DIY installation without wiring
Cons:- G1 Gateway is sold separately for Wi-Fi remote control and voice assistant support
- Four AA batteries are not included
- Using app and smart-home features requires setup
Best for: Owners or small-property managers who want fingerprint access, activity logs, and a longer stated battery interval
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote control out of the box or do not want to buy and configure a separate gateway
- Material:All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant
- Finish:Satin nickel
- Access methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, key fob, mechanical key
- Battery life:At least 12 months
- Power:4 AA batteries; not included
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi via G1 Gateway, sold separately
- Security features:AES128 encryption, activity logs, anti-peeping password, intrusion alarms
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant via G1 Gateway
Our verdict“Pick the Veise VE017 if a longer stated battery interval and access logs outweigh the need for built-in remote connectivity.”
How We Picked
I compared these locks on the factors that change everyday entry: available unlock methods, whether remote control is built in or depends on a connection, smart-home compatibility, and how much the lock adds beyond a standard keypad deadbolt. I also considered the practical fit questions buyers need to settle before ordering, including whether a listing describes a deadbolt or a knob or handle set, and whether a keyed backup is included.
The ranking favors useful access choices and a clear role in a typical home. The Schlage Encode leads as a connected deadbolt with built-in Wi-Fi; Aqara earns a distinct place for Apple Home Key and fingerprint access, while TEEHO is aimed at buyers who value a simpler keypad. Products with cameras, multiple biometric methods, or handle hardware may suit particular households, but their extra functions do not make them a better fit for every door. Where product names alone do not establish compatibility or included components, I treat those details as items to verify in the listing.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Door Locks
Before choosing a smart lock, match the hardware to your door and your household’s entry habits. A long feature list helps only when the lock fits the opening, works with the devices you already use, and has a practical fallback for the day a phone or network is unavailable.
Check the door hardware and fit first
Start by identifying whether you need a deadbolt, a knob, or a handle set; these are different pieces of door hardware, even when product listings use similar language. Measure your existing bore hole, door thickness, and backset, then compare them with the manufacturer’s specifications. A smart deadbolt usually replaces the deadbolt while leaving a separate knob or lever in place. A keypad knob or handle may change both the locking point and the way the door is operated. Buyers often focus on the exterior appearance and miss the interior clearance needed for a motorized assembly. If your door has a nonstandard setup or a multipoint lock, confirm compatibility before ordering.
Choose entry methods around how people actually arrive
List who needs access and how they usually approach the door before choosing between a keypad, fingerprint reader, phone credential, or physical key. A keypad can work well for guests and household members who do not want to install an app, while a fingerprint reader can make repeated entry quick for people whose prints it recognizes reliably. Phone-based options can reduce the need to remember a code, but they rely on compatible devices and settings. A camera-equipped lock adds a way to see visitors, though that may be unnecessary if you already have a doorbell camera. For children, caregivers, or frequent guests, consider how easily you can create, change, and remove access credentials.
Separate local access from remote control
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Thread, and Matter describe different parts of how a lock can connect and interact with a home setup. Built-in Wi-Fi may allow remote app access without an added bridge, while other arrangements can depend on a compatible hub or nearby smart-home controller. Remote access is useful for letting in a visitor when you are away, but it adds network and account dependencies to the process. A lock that works locally through a keypad can still be useful during an internet outage, depending on its design. Before buying, verify which features work without a subscription, hub, or cloud connection. Match the lock’s supported ecosystem to the phones and smart-home devices your household already uses.
Plan for batteries, outages, and backup entry
Smart locks need power for electronic access, so find out what battery type they use and how the lock signals low power. Check whether the design includes a physical keyway, an emergency power contact, or another backup method, and learn what that method requires. A keypad does not automatically mean a lock will keep working when its batteries are depleted. A Wi-Fi outage may affect remote control while leaving local codes available, but the behavior varies by model. Keep a backup key somewhere accessible outside the locked room if the lock supports one, and avoid relying on a phone as the only way in. These small checks matter most for a main entry door used every day.
Decide which smart-home features are worth adding
Integration is useful when it supports a routine you will actually use, such as checking whether the door is locked or adding entry to a home automation. Compatibility labels do not guarantee that every feature works across every platform, so check the exact lock, app, and controller combination. Matter support can help devices communicate across supported ecosystems, but it does not erase hardware or feature differences. Apple Home Key is especially relevant to buyers who already use compatible Apple devices and want a phone or watch credential. If you mainly want keypad entry, paying attention to broader integrations may add setup work without improving daily use. Choose the ecosystem after deciding what task you want the lock to perform.
Pay for a specific convenience, not a longer feature list
Extra features make sense when they replace a separate task or solve a household problem. A camera and lock combination may appeal if you want visitor video and door access in one device, while a standalone deadbolt can be simpler if you already have a camera. Fingerprint entry may reduce code sharing, but the household still needs a fallback for guests and recognition failures. Built-in connectivity can save an accessory, though it also makes network setup part of installation. Before paying for additional functions, consider ongoing maintenance, app setup, and whether everyone who uses the door can operate the lock. The right value comes from features that fit your routine, not from having the most functions on the box.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I keep using a regular key with a smart door lock?
Some smart deadbolts retain a physical keyway, while keypad or handle products may use a different backup design. Check the exact listing for a keyed cylinder or another emergency entry method rather than assuming one is included. If you want to preserve your existing key setup, verify whether the new lock can be rekeyed to match your current key. A physical backup can be valuable during battery trouble or an app issue. Also plan where to keep a spare that is reachable if the lock is the only entrance you use.
Will a Wi-Fi smart lock still work if my internet goes down?
Internet loss often affects remote app control first, but the effect on keypad, fingerprint, or Bluetooth entry depends on the model. Check the manual or product specifications for offline behavior rather than treating Wi-Fi as the lock’s only access path. Built-in codes may continue to work locally on some locks, while remote commands and notifications can stop until the connection returns. A separate hub or smart-home controller can also affect which features remain available. Keep a physical or other independent backup method if uninterrupted entry matters.
Should I choose fingerprint entry or a keypad?
A keypad is generally easier to share across a household because each person can use a code without enrolling a biometric. Fingerprint entry can make frequent arrivals quick and can avoid passing codes around, though recognition may vary with finger placement or condition. Many buyers will prefer a lock that offers both methods or includes a clear backup, but the added options do not matter if the hardware does not fit the door. Consider whether guests, children, or caregivers need predictable access. Pick the method that remains convenient for the least tech-comfortable person who uses the door.
Do I need a smart-home hub for remote access?
Not always: some locks have built-in Wi-Fi for remote app access, while other models use a hub, bridge, or compatible controller for certain functions. The connection type can also affect which smart-home routines and voice-control features are available. Read the setup requirements for the exact model and distinguish local app control from control while away from home. A hub may add useful ecosystem support, but it can also mean another device to configure and keep powered. If remote access is essential, confirm the full chain of devices and services required before buying.
Is a lock with a built-in camera a good replacement for a video doorbell?
A combined device such as the myQ Secure View is designed to bring entry control and visitor video together, which may suit a door where you want both functions in one installation. It may not match the placement, viewing angle, or features of a separate doorbell camera, so compare those details with your entryway. Consider whether your current doorbell already covers visitor monitoring; if it does, a standalone deadbolt may better fit your needs. Combined hardware can reduce the number of devices, but it puts more functions into one product and app. Check how video access, storage, power, and the lock’s entry methods work before replacing separate equipment.
Conclusion
For most buyers seeking a connected deadbolt, I’d start with the Schlage Encode as the best overall pick. The TEEHO TE001 is the best value-minded fit for someone who mainly wants keypad entry, while the Aqara UWB U400 is the premium-leaning choice for an Apple household that values Home Key and fingerprint access. Beginners who prefer a simpler setup can look at TEEHO’s keypad-first approach, after checking its fit and backup access details. For a specific need, choose the myQ Secure View when combining visitor video and a lock suits your door, or compare the Veise VE017 finish options if fingerprint access is your priority. Confirm the hardware dimensions and connectivity requirements before settling on any model.
Fall yard work Picks
leaf blowers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
